Nominating abuggeredhedgie for tier 1.

Never really saw him try until I had a 2v2 against him the other day.  Me and Orcun vs Hedgie and Thundercles. When that kid puts in his A game, man does he know how to play.  It was a fantastic game, Hedgie and Thunder eventually pulled out a win.

Thunder played really well too, but I don't know him well enough yet.

Oh I just noticed Mithrandar is not in the Tier 1 list either. THIS IS A CONSPIRACY!

ofc it is though pacov hasn't put himself in tier 1.....yet.....

Edit: I agree with split btw Pacov for tier 1.

Pacov, you should be in tier 1, no need for modesty.

I second this. For one thing, he does not have tower anxiety.

Nominated for tier "stop changing your freaking name" - wallstop.

Anyway, digging through the posts since I last commented to see what I've missed and who to add and blahblahblah

Does anyone know mooks67?  I don't think I've played him before... anyway katana seems to think he's meh, so unless someone has something else to say about him, no spot on the list. 

Heh - you fix their names or develop a magical process to whereby their names auto-update based on whatever billy wants to be called today. 

gL-idealopamp and Thundercles added to tier 2 per request.  I agree they belong in this list.  

Rawwrrs's not playing all that much at this point.  Mostly on Wow, last I heard, but he played a few games.  He easily fits into tier 2 at least.  Adding to tier 2 for now.  I might remove him if I remember and notice he goes inactive.

Let's discuss hedgie some more - I think tier 1 might be appropriate for him.  Trying to think why I'd have any reservations... he's consistently solid and an asset on any team... he gets team tactics and strategy... is good in 2v2, 3v3, etc.  Hmm... what about character selection.  His sedna is top notch... what else though?  Anything else come to mind that he plays exceptionally well?

heh - the conspiracy is in GM collecting tier 1 players.  This may have been discussed in this thread already, but I had some reservations about mith.  Mostly just due to not getting to play with him all that much.  I'm not sure what he's done or does in games that qualify him for tier 1.  Maybe some replays (sorry if some were already posted or we talked about this one already).

I'll go to tier 1.... there's just something a little lame about creating a list and putting yourself at the top of the list. 

Anyway, updating the list now.  Feel free to discuss hedgie a bit more if you have any thoughts on him.

I support this tier.

I would also like to nominate mandatorycloud's regulus and minion oak to tier 2, though this is through my observation of playing with and against him.

bah don't worry ninki i don't care if I am in the tier 1 list  or not

edit: deleted double post

I have a good Oak. You typically see my playing my Oak on Levi though, which is never good because I try to play like Sed and that doesn't work out -.-

I'm not gonna say I'm the best Oak in the game but it is uncommon for me to be "out-Oak'd". 

I'm certainly one of the better DAs. Now, there really aren't a lot of people who have a good DA so I guess that isn't as impressive and DA is just a weaker character (I only go DA if the rest of my team is Oak-UB so Oak can shield my ass and UB can kill them and also only if they don't have a UB on their team). I haven't played a lot of my DA recently but I do have the replay where I beat lethstang here if you need to watch it:

http://www.box.net/shared/q0bcvrl9s3

I'm a decent Beast. I will say I'm never aggressive enough but I do know how to play him (not that it is exactly hard. Hit three, hit one, click a bad guy, right click, sigil, get a kill, talk shit) and I can play him in high-level games, it's just typically better for my team for me to go Sed because someone else is a better beast and I'm a better Sed.

I can play both TB and Occulus proficiently/well but I'm not comfortable with my skill level in high-tier games quite yet.

I'm a "bad" Erebus, Rook and Regulus in that you would never want me playing them in a competitive game even though I know how to play them.

I will say that my lack of being able to play every demigod competitively is my biggest flaw.

Yeah... just remember... tis but a silly list.  But if you want to participate in the silly discussion, tell me why mith belongs in tier 1 and/or pop up some replays!

^Gah... I don't save replays but I guess I have to start. I shall get you in that list Mith, one way or another.

I actually didn't notice until Omicron brought it up. Now, it may look like that at first, but what actually happened was that I asked around people I play with on a regular basis, which happens to be part of the Tier 1 list. I think that has to do with the fact that most of the people I have been playing with were here since pretty much day 1, and all the good guys that made us seem like average players just quit the game.

I've beat omicron twice yesterday but didn't save the replays

hedgie - I'm going to have to pay attention to your oak.  If I remember right, its a decent shield oak.  You do what you do well, but nothing really stands out to me as awesome.  Or... another way of saying that - hedgie goes oak - I'm not saying to myself "fuuuuuuuuccccck" - whereas your sedna can be quite troublesome   I'll probably check out your replay against with da.  I know what you mean about beast.  You have a decent ub, but I agree with your assessment - doing the team thing usually means you end up as senda. 

I'm going to have to pay more attention to your oak next time we are up against each other and you get the chance to use him.  Or just throw a replay up here when you get the chance. 

I don't know... imo, you're about as damn close to tier 1 as anyone could be.  I'd pretty much call you out as the best sedna in the game and I think that's a pretty fair assessment.