That's not true at all.  Occasionally someone (morpheas) will get frustrated about not being able to play with other GM players, but other then that 85% of our games have one GM on each side unless other team agrees to us playing together.

I think the issue will be resolved with a few games and I look forward to seeing them play out. 

Also I'd like to testify that this list and lagwars are a double-edged blade:

On one hand I'm getting a ton more really good, close games between coordinated teams and I have a resource of recommended players

OTOH it sucks so much more when someone is dc'd from a game like that than it does in a random PUG

I might have to go back to committed mediocre PUGs just because I'm less likely to end up

Demigod at its best is sorta like a graceful, elegant swan with one wing ^^

Thund3rfist, there might be many other reasons why the people left or wanted to play a specific game together. There is no one in GM that cares about stats . Please do check my games list, you will see lots of GM playing against each other, Gm playing vs other premade teams and GM playing 2 vs 3.

I didn't start the clan idea or anything but i don't think the clan had the ideology of getting the best players. As ninki mentioned earlier, most of us have been playing together for a long long time. And 1 reason that we play together was that we all had similar skills on the game, and we could get good games.So it ended resulting with several experienced players that plays together forming a clan. 

I am excited to see the replays of clan Pacov and other members of GM mentioned above playing to each other. I don't think it would be easy for either side but will be good games for sure.

Man, it sucks writing replies without being able to quote stuff   . 

I've had plenty of pickup games with just 1 member of GM. They're all cool people who don't really give two shits what happens, as long as a game gets going from what I've noticed.

How about GM will make in-clan tournament to spit out two best players and then those two will play against some two Tier 1 players that will decide to go against them, it takes some time and organizing but hey, it's not as lame as "Hear us out, we just made clan and here we are - the best Tier 1 players, wooohooo !"

If we will see a total annihilation then tits or gtfo, if it will be a fair fight. Well, they really deserve it.

And i really laugh out this system that generally its people from Tier 2 "voting" who can join, i mean... come on, it was supposed to be choosen by Tier 2 people to join Tier 1 ?

Anyway, getting into Tier 1 IMHO should be made tourney-like every month. That way first - it would be frikkin exciting, second - i wouldnt look at the list and didn't think "Oh... but... why ? Who decided it ?" instead "Damn, those are really good players in really buggy game".

It's my idea after participating in ConquerCup's.

2nana for t1?  Outside of clans and with regards to playing different demigods on all kinds of teams (and without stacking) in my experience 2nana stands out of most players out there.

Anyone else any thoughts?  Every game I play with him he turns weaker team into a stronger one.  Lost a game to him again yesterday though this time our team was weaker, had a player who was on his 3rd game after 4 month retirment (played decent tho). 

Nana played an amazing reg imo anyway.  Have a replay if needed will upload, but wanna know what others think of him.  In pug games he is prolly the best player I've seen, I'm sure he'd do great in pm as well.  Mainly though I like how the guy, at least in my experience, does not stack teams and carries his team very often

If it is all about tier 1 thing you should put renz in there i remember he was pissed when you didn't put him in tier 1

2nana? never heard of him

neither have I untill i started running into him raping me in the games I should have obviously won:D.  As far as being an all around good player nana is it from my experience with him, even if some demigod specific players may be better with a single dg

p.s.

I don't think I ever played on his team.  Nor are him and myself friends or talk to each other, he just had an impression on me because all of the other good players usually have a team to complement them, his are just random pugs

Cow plays a beasty...beast even though it only mentions TB/Oak for him.

I just looked up 2nana's stats. It seems like he plays mostly 1v1's to me that isn't good enough for tier 1 list.

It's because he's Korean and he doesn't know much English, so it must be hard for him to ever be able to form a solid team with anyone. I saw him play with Heros though, maybe there's some hope there.

maybe that is it because I did not get much English out of the guy.  I only played 3v3s against him, but if he plays many 1v1s, that is more of a reason to be t1.  (Edit: that's is since t1 is defined to do well in more variety of games.  the guy is above most of the t2 list including me so;))

2nana is pretty good. He does has a good knowledge of map control and harrasment. He only does 1v1s, though. You aren't tier 1 in my book if you don't know how to work with a team. If he played team games, I think there's a chance he'd be tier 1.

If u ever come up with a tier 1.5, be sure to add me to that list-- seeing as I am neither tier 1 nor tier 2. 

(and no smarteleck replies about how "I must be lower then hahaha"-- especially since I got owned in like half of my games last night lol)